以色列刚炸完也门，1小时后就挨了导弹，胡塞红海击沉3万吨巨轮！_the_in_ship

In early July 2025, the volatile situation in the Middle East erupted once again, with tensions flaring up at an alarming speed. It began when the Houthi militants in Yemen launched a significant attack in the Red Sea. On July 6th, after a lull of seven months, they managed to sink a massive 30,000-ton vessel named the \"Magic Ocean,\" a Liberian-flagged ship reportedly heading toward Israel. The sinking occurred less than 100 kilometers southwest of the port of Hodeidah, catching regional watchers by surprise.

British maritime authorities provided a detailed account of the incident: several Houthi small boats swarmed the giant ship, unleashing rockets and small arms fire. The Western security personnel onboard fought back fiercely, even managing to destroy two of the Houthis’ explosive-laden unmanned boats. Despite this resistance, the sheer number of attackers overwhelmed the defenders. Two suicide boats rammed into the ship, setting it ablaze and forcing the crew to abandon ship. Compared to last year’s wave of Red Sea attacks on commercial vessels, this assault was far more intense—this time, the attackers succeeded in sinking the ship rather than merely inflicting damage.

展开剩余85%

No sooner had the Houthis scored this major hit than Israel responded aggressively. In the early hours of July 7th, the Israeli Air Force launched a surprise bombing campaign targeting Yemeni ports such as Hodeidah and Ras Isa, as well as several power plants. At least 20 airstrikes were reported in a single operation. Israeli officials claimed these attacks destroyed key Houthi bases used for transferring Iranian weapons and for launching drone and missile strikes against Israeli civilians. They even targeted the “Galaxy Leader” car carrier ship, seized by Israel in 2023, accusing it of carrying radar equipment used to monitor international shipping. Observers widely interpreted these strikes as direct retaliation for the sinking of the massive cargo vessel.

However, Israel seemed unprepared for the Houthis’ swift and fierce response. Less than an hour after the air raids, Yemen fired a hypersonic missile targeting southern Israel. Both sides provided conflicting accounts of the missile’s fate. Israeli military sources confidently asserted that their Arrow 2 and 3 missile defense systems, alongside the American THAAD batteries, successfully intercepted the threat. Conversely, Iranian-backed media claimed the missile penetrated Israeli defenses undeterred. Regardless of the truth, southern Israel erupted in alarms, with air raid sirens blaring across settlements in the West Bank, Jerusalem, and the Ben Gurion Airport halting all flights in emergency mode. If interception had been flawless, such widespread panic might not have been necessary.

The Houthis maintained a defiant stance, issuing a statement declaring their air defenses had effectively repelled the Israeli aggression. They vowed to accelerate support operations for Gaza, signaling a continuation, even intensification, of their militant activities. This rhetoric was consistent with their past two years of persistent hostility—from attacking vessels in the Red Sea to missile strikes on Israel, they have remained relentless.

As tensions escalated, Iran quickly stepped forward to back the Houthis. Major General Sanaei Rad issued a stern warning: if Israel made another reckless move, the consequences would far surpass those of the recent 12-day war. He revealed that Israel’s previous plans to bomb Iranian scientific facilities had been thwarted by the relocation of critical documents. Sanaei Rad further warned that Tehran had not yet deployed its most advanced “Real Promise-3” missile systems but hinted that even more devastating missiles were ready if provoked. The underlying threat was clear—Iran’s missile arsenal remains a formidable concern for Israel.

The timing of this new conflict flare-up was especially delicate, coinciding with ongoing negotiations between Hamas and Israel. While talks unfolded at the negotiation table, both sides were simultaneously intensifying pressure behind the scenes. Israel’s strikes against the Houthis served not only as retaliation but also as a show of strength aimed at Hamas. Meanwhile, the Houthis’ aggressive actions—sinking a giant ship and firing advanced missiles—sent a blunt message to Israel: negotiating with Hamas does not mean easing the broader regional hostility; Israel faces multiple foes across the Middle East.

Houthi commander Abdul-Malik al-Houthi made this explicit in recent remarks. He called on resistance groups across West Asia to unite against what he described as American and Israeli attempts to destroy their faith and plunder their resources. He named Gaza, Lebanon, Iran, and Iraq as key fronts, declaring the fight against Israel a collective responsibility. Al-Houthi vowed that even if the conflict dragged on indefinitely, retreat was not an option. While this might sound like rhetoric, their recent actions—rapid and expansive strikes from the Red Sea to southern Israel—demonstrate a tangible increase in their operational reach and responsiveness compared to two years ago.

Looking at the recent chain reaction, a clear pattern emerges: the conflict cycle in the Middle East is accelerating. Previously, Israel’s strikes might have been followed by retaliations after several days. Now, the Houthis have adopted a “no overnight retaliation” principle—striking back within hours or even minutes. This rapid tit-for-tat exchange makes the situation far more volatile and difficult to manage.

Israel likely believes its alliance with the United States and its missile defense systems provide a safe shield, making strikes on the Houthis a low-risk, high-reward gamble. However, they appear to have underestimated the Houthis’ advancements in weaponry. The recent hypersonic missile attack, whether intercepted or not, demonstrated a significant leap in the Houthis’ missile technology, capable of challenging Israel’s Arrow and THAAD systems. Likewise, their Red Sea naval tactics have evolved from harassment to outright ship sinking—directly threatening Israel’s vital maritime logistics.

Iran’s role is also crucial. Their overt support and covert provision of technology and weapons to the Houthis, coupled with public claims of missile stockpiles sufficient for a protracted conflict, bolster the morale and capabilities of allied resistance groups. Any Israeli strike against Iran’s nuclear or missile infrastructure now risks severe retaliation. Tehran’s pointed references to Israeli scientific institutions like the Weizmann Institute underscore their strategic knowledge and readiness.

Ultimately, the United States remains a key but challenged actor in this equation. The deployment of THAAD batteries and other missile defenses across the Middle East has not decisively stopped these missile threats, calling into question the reliability of America’s “protective umbrella” in the region. If even the Houthis’ missiles can slip through, allied countries around the Gulf may begin to doubt Washington’s deterrent power.

Currently, the conflict resembles a vicious cycle: Israel’s airstrikes provoke increasingly fierce Houthi counterattacks; the Houthis’ escalating provocations fuel Israel’s desire for suppression through bombardment; and Iran’s backing inflames and sustains the resistance’s resolve. Meanwhile, Hamas and Israel’s negotiations teeter amid the gunfire—on the battlefield’s outcome depends the strength of their bargaining positions.

What happens next is uncertain. But one thing is clear: the Houthis, emboldened by their successful sinking of a giant vessel and firing of advanced missiles, show no signs of retreat. Israel, smarting from these blows, is highly likely to seek further retaliation. Iran’s warnings about “more destructive missiles” hint that the conflict’s intensity may soon escalate.

The Middle East’s volatile turmoil has never truly settled, but this latest “no overnight reprisal” rhythm marks a faster and more dangerous phase. It may not be long before the next round of clashes erupts—whether in missile exchanges or more ships sinking in the Red Sea will depend on who strikes faster and harder.

发布于：天津市